Cruise Ship Wiki
Back

Cabin 5298 · Carnival Celebration

Deck 5 - staterooms (Deck 5) · Carnival Cruise Line

DeckDeck 5 - staterooms (Deck 5)
Stateroom typeInterior
GroupInterior

Interior staterooms

7.3/10 Cabin score
Quiet 8
Motion 6
Convenience 8

Cabin 5298 is an Interior (category 4B) on Carnival Celebration.

Cabin 5298 is an Interior on Deck 5 of Carnival Celebration, and it sits far forward. You are near the bottom of the passenger decks, which is the steadiest place to be, though it is a fair climb to the open air. Out at this end you feel the sea. In rough water the movement here is noticeably stronger. We score it 6 out of 10 for steadiness.

You are all but on top of the lift bank, about 1 cabin away. Nothing on board is a shorter walk. The price is footsteps past your door and the lift chiming at odd hours. Quiet comes out at 8 out of 10, roughly par for this ship. For getting about, 8 out of 10.

Counting from the bow, it is the 23rd cabin position of 81 along Deck 5. Deck 5 also has Spa Treatment Rooms, Thermal Suites, Cloud 9 Spa and Salon on it. There are 285 cabins along this deck, so the corridor is a long walk end to end.

It is booked as an Interior. No window, which makes it the darkest and cheapest room on board and, for a lot of people, the best sleep they get all week. If waking to daylight matters to you, an ocean view is the smallest step up.

Against the rest of the ship it is noisier than three quarters of the 2,681 cabins on board and better placed for getting around than 98 per cent of them. It suits light sleepers and families running back to the cabin several times a day.

Scored by Cruise Ship Wiki using model v1.8, from the position of this cabin relative to every public space on the ship. Each part is out of 10.

View on the interactive deck plan

Nearby cabins (by position on the deck plan)

Same deckCabin 5294
Same deckCabin 5302

Member photos & tours

Loading…

Other cabins on deck 5

5294 5295 5296 5297 5298 5299 5300 5301 5302

See all 285 cabins on deck 5, scored and compared